"Q2 2024 - The Confidence to Jump"

  • By: Joseph R. Tranchini, CFA, CFP®
  • August 2024

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT

 

EMPLOYMENT

 

INFLATION

 

FORWARD LOOKING ASSESSMENT

When thinking about how I was going to start this quarter’s forward looking assessment piece a couple of ideas came to mind as to how I would go about communicating how this recent batch of economic data aligns with the Fed’s (likely) soon-to-cut narrative.

Maybe its like a bird jumping out of its nest and flying out of a tree? Maybe its like taking leap of faith from a cliff into tropical waters? Perhaps something to do with ‘walking the plank’? Surely a metaphor about a space shuttle dropping back down into orbit would work, right? Nope – not even close to working, and here’s why.

Those metaphors all ‘fall-short’ by ‘falling-too-much’.

Much of the narrative in the financial news has been about when the Fed would cut rates, and by how much, and would they keep doing it, and of course whether it was the right thing to be doing. What tends to happen when we get into this way of thinking is that it becomes easy to create a subconscious dissection of 2 distinct realities (a high-rate environment, and a low-rate environment), but this could not be further from the actual reality of the situation. No, the rate cuts that are (likely) to occur this year won’t be metaphorically like jumping off a cliff in the Caribbean – instead, they’ll be more like the family dog getting off the couch onto the floor… Technically lower? Yes. Absurdly/accommodatively/free-money-era lower? No.

A question worth asking though is, what exactly changed from Q1 to Q2 which led the shift from the ‘data-is-not-cooperating’ paradigm to this new ‘soon-to-be-lower’ narrative? Well, in a nutshell, the data changed….again. Specifically speaking, Inflation went from averaging 4.5% (SAAR – measured monthly) in Q1 to 1.5% in Q2. Not only did the overall level of inflation cool-off from Q1 levels, but arguably more importantly was the change in the composition of inflation during this time. Relative to Q1, in Q2 we got outright deflationary pressures in Goods, while Services inflation (the most robust and persistent area of inflation) actually decreased by a substantial amount. Q1’s average for Service inflation was 5.8%, compared to Q2’s average of 2.9%. Being one of the more referenced parts of the inflation picture, it is likely that this compositional change in inflation was ultimately what gave the Fed ‘greater confidence’ to signal the beginning of the rate cut cycle.

However, the Fed looks at a great many variables and considerations when making policy decisions, not just inflation itself. So, let’s take a look at one of the more commonly referenced datapoints when it comes to labor market conditions – Job Openings. Yes, Job Openings have been a highly scrutinized metric in the current labor market environment and here is why. Previously, the Fed’s view was that the labor market had a supply/demand problem. Too much demand for workers, and too little workers to go around. This dynamic has produced one of the most beneficial developments for workers in the modern era, above usual wage growth. However, wage growth can be viewed as a double-edged sword of sorts. With more money comes more spending, and with more spending there is (likely – not for certain – but likely) increased demand-pull inflation. The reason why Job Openings are so scrutinized in this regard is that they are a direct measure of opportunity for workers, and in short, opportunity leads to wage pressure and wage pressure leads to inflation. This could largely be viewed as the second ‘piece of the puzzle’ the Fed was looking to see, a cooling labor market by way of lower Job Openings, which is exactly what we have got a drop of about -33% in the number of Job Openings from the all-time high experienced in 2022 down to a level that is now consistent with the trend growth of the economy.

Although that does sound a little morbid when I run that train of thought through my head, “We have lower inflation because of less opportunities available”; however, there is a bright spot of subtlety in that backdrop that while there are definitively less opportunities available out there, there has not been outright job loss at an aggregate level in the economy during this time. Dare I say ‘soft landing’?

So, as we move forward into the future, what are some things that we are likely to see? A few come to mind. In the past I’ve written about the potential break-out of price wars in some industries, and that is exactly what we’ve seen with larger retailers competing directly against each other by dropping prices to bring customers in (or back). I think that is a trend that will continue moving forward as a more-selective consumer will continue to vote with their wallet. Additionally, the rate cut cycle may not reach longer-term rates as directly as folks subconsciously think, which would mean financing costs could get modestly cheaper – but will be a far cry away from the free-money era of the post global financial crisis. Should these financing costs only drop by a modest amount, activity in the housing market may remain subdued as existing homeowners who are ‘locked-in’ to extremely lower mortgage rates cannot justify moving locations and switching out a historically cheap mortgage for one that is many multiples more expensive. Finally, I would largely expect consumers to continue spending at around historically normal levels as wage growth pressures normalize, which would loosely translate to a job market that is steady and more balanced, much like the labor market of 2016-2019. The bonanza-style hiring that many sectors engaged in during 2020-2022 (especially tech) is likely to be a mistake employers will be reluctant to make again, further guarding against the potential for a revamp of labor market supply/demand imbalances.

As the U.S. Economy (likely) takes its first step off the interest rate cliff, it is all but certain that new storylines and headlines will emerge – however we can move forward into this new era knowing that many of previous ‘dark clouds’ of the past few years show genuine signs of dissipating, potentially giving us a much clearer view from atop our current cliff to make that first ‘step-of-faith’ downward with confidence.

 

[See Below for Disclosures & Annotations]

DISCLOSURES

Content in this material is for general information only and not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and may not be invested into directly.

The economic forecasts set forth in this material may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

The companies presented here are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be viewed as an investment recommendation.

Tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to change, which can materially impact investment results. LPL Financial does not provide tax advice. Clients should consult with their personal tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of investing.

 

ANNOTATIONS

  1. FactSet. “Economics – Country/Region – United States”. August 1, 2024
  2. Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Gross Domestic Product, 2nd Quarter and Year 2024 (Advance Estimate)”. August 1, 2024.
  3. Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey”. August 1, 2024.
  4. Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Personal Income”. August 1, 2024.
  5. FRED. “5-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate”. August 1, 2024.
  6. FRED. “10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate”. August 1, 2024.